Policy requires asylum-seekers who pass through another country to first seek refuge there…
EDITORS NOTE: This story has been updated.
(Liberty Headlines) The Supreme Court is allowing nationwide enforcement of a new Trump administration rule that prevents most Central American immigrants who pass through another safe-harbor country from seeking asylum in the United States.
The justices’ order late Wednesday temporarily undoes a lower-court ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that had blocked the new asylum policy in some states along the southern border.
The policy is meant to deny asylum to anyone who passes through another country on the way to the U.S. without seeking protection there first.
“BIG United States Supreme Court WIN for the Border on Asylum!” President Donald Trump tweeted.
Asylum claims have skyrocketed in recent years as open-border advocates work to inform illegal immigrants how to exploit loopholes in order to game the U.S. immigration laws by claiming refugee status.
As a result of the recent influx, detention centers at the border, where the illegal immigrants are expected to await processing, have been met with severe overcrowding.
While interpretation of the asylum eligibility requirements has been lax, refugees who are not specifically being subject to a more specific form of political persecution are largely ineligible under the new rule.
The legal challenge to the new policy has a brief but somewhat convoluted history. U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar in San Francisco blocked the new policy from taking effect in late July. A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals narrowed Tigar’s order so that it applied only in Arizona and California, states that are within the 9th Circuit.
That left the administration free to enforce the policy on asylum seekers arriving in New Mexico and Texas. Tigar issued a new order on Monday that reimposed a nationwide hold on asylum policy. The 9th Circuit again narrowed his order on Tuesday.
The high court action allows the Republican administration to impose the new policy everywhere while the court case against it continues.
It’s unclear how quickly the policy will be rolled out and how exactly it fits in with the other efforts by the administration to restrict border crossings and tighten asylum rules.
For example, thousands of people are waiting on lists at border crossings in Mexico to claim asylum in the U.S. And more than 30,000 people have been turned back to Mexico to wait out their asylum claims.
Asylum seekers must pass an initial screening called a “credible fear” interview, a hurdle that a vast majority clear. Under the new policy, they would fail the test unless they sought asylum in at least one country they traveled through and were denied. They would be placed in fast-track deportation proceedings and flown to their home countries at U.S. expense.
The American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who is representing immigrant advocacy groups in the case, Lee Gelernt, said: “This is just a temporary step, and we’re hopeful we’ll prevail at the end of the day. The lives of thousands of families are at stake.”
Justice Department spokesperson Alexei Woltornist said the agency was “pleased that the Supreme Court intervened in this case,” adding, “This action will assist the Administration in its objectives to bring order to the crisis at the southern border, close loopholes in our immigration system, and discourage frivolous claims.”
Drawn from additional reporting by the Associated Press.