Day 1 of Roger Stone’s Russia Collusion Trial Offers Glimpse of Public Spectacle to Come

‘The defense has assumed bias that has not been shown on the part of those people…’

Roger Stone / PHOTO: The Associated Press

(Liberty Headlines) The trial of Roger Stone, the flamboyant former confidant of President Donald Trump, kicked off Tuesday amid a host of medical issues involving both the defendant and a spectator.

Shortly after jury selection began, the courtroom had to be cleared for more than a half hour when a man sitting in the back row moaned loudly and collapsed on the floor. He was revived and helped from the room by medical staff.

Not long after the session resumed, Stone himself went home early, telling U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson that he had food poisoning.

Stone, a longtime Republican provocateur, faces charges related to accusations he sought to collaborate with WikiLeaks to release emails that had been hacked—allegedly by Russia—in order to damage Hillary Clinton‘s Democratic presidential campaign.

Among the revelations from the emails were the extent of widespread collusion between Clinton staffers and the media, with some major outlets vetting articles they worried the campaign might disapprove of. Clinton also received advance access to debate questions courtesy of longtime ally Donna Brazile, at the time a CNN contributor.

For her Democratic voters, though, most damaging of all was a revelation that Clinton worked closely with the Democratic National Committee to freeze out primary challenger Bernie Sanders.

That resulted in the resignation of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., from her post as DNC chair just as the party was preparing to host its national convention.

Clinton surrogates later used that hacking as a pretense to levy false accusations that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia during the election. Those claims were debunked with the release of the two-year Mueller investigation, which nonetheless ensnared Stone and other top Trump advisers.

Stone’s indictment in January stems directly from that investigation. He is accused of lying to lawmakers about WikiLeaks, tampering with witnesses and obstructing a House Intelligence Committee probe into the Russia collusion hoax.

Stone, whose history in Republican political circles dates back to the Nixon administration, has consistently criticized the case against him as politically motivated. Day One was focused on jury selection and featured some of the political complexities—not to mention the media spectacles and tomfoolery—that may dominate the case.

Judge Jackson started the day by fending off attempts by the defense team to exclude any potential jurors who worked in the U.S. government or had a negative view of Trump. Berman pointed out that excluding all government workers may be impossible given the nature of the District of Columbia jury pool.

Sure enough, the first potential juror was a woman who had worked in the Office of Management and Budget in the Obama White House and whose husband is a lawyer in the Department of Justice.

Jackson also rejected the notion that a juror who was opposed to Trump would not be fair to Stone.

“That doesn’t mean the juror is biased against THIS defendant on THESE charges,” Jackson told defense attorneys. “The defense has assumed bias that has not been shown on the part of those people.”

Stone, a longtime friend of the president’s, briefly served on Trump’s campaign but was pushed out amid infighting with campaign manager Corey Lewandowski. Though sidelined, he continued to communicate with Trump and stayed plugged into his circle of advisers.

The indictment says Stone, who was arrested by the FBI in a raid at his Florida home, repeatedly discussed WikiLeaks in 2016 with campaign associates. It lays out in detail Stone’s conversations about emails stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta and posted in the weeks before Trump beat Clinton.

After WikiLeaks released another round of hacked emails from the DNC on July 22, 2016, the indictment says, a senior Trump campaign official “was directed” to contact Stone about additional releases and about “what other damaging information” WikiLeaks had “regarding the Clinton campaign.” The indictment does not name the official or say who directed the outreach to Stone.

Stone is also accused of threatening New York radio host Randy Credico in an effort to prevent Credico from contradicting Stone’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee.

Adapted from reporting by the Associated Press