‘This hold on security assistance was not significant…’
(Deroy Murdock, Liberty Headlines) House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., announced Thursday that Democrats will draft articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump.
Pelosi could not have sounded more ominous.
She insinuated that Trump is like an “oppressive monarch” or a “king president.” She warned, “And if we allow a president to be above the law, we do so surely at the peril of our republic.”
Pelosi is correct: President Trump is not above the law. In fact, it’s amazing how many laws, legal precedents and other legal authorities he has obeyed throughout Ukraine-o-rama.
• In a largely overlooked portion of his testimony, one of the Democrats’ star witnesses stated that the National Security Council found the 55-day pause in U.S. military aid to Ukraine was lawful.
“On the purely legal point of view?” asked Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill.
Vindman replied: “Correct.”
The White House should fly Marine One over Capitol Hill and hurl hundreds of copies of this legal opinion out the windows.
• Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy by phone, “I would like you to do us a favor” and examine Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election, rumored hacking of Democrat computers and potential corruption by the Bidens.
The U.S. and Ukraine agreed to “provide mutual assistance … in connection with the investigation, prosecution, and prevention of offenses, and in proceedings related to criminal matters.”
As this accord envisioned, Trump and Zelenskiy conferred on investigating, prosecuting and preventing Ukrainian campaign intervention and any possible corruption between the Bidens and Burisma—the crooked Ukrainian natural-gas company that reportedly paid board member Hunter Biden $83,333 per month while his father handled U.S.–Ukrainian policy as America’s vice president.
• The aid pause was within Trump’s responsibility to assure that $391 million did not vanish down a black hole of graft. Also, OMB official Mark Sandy told the Intelligence Committee that he “attributed the hold to the president’s concern about other countries not contributing money to Ukraine.” This policy echoed Trump’s perfectly legal pronouncements on this matter.
“I gave the money because [Republican Senator from Ohio] Rob Portman and others called me and asked,” Trump said on Oct. 2. “But I don’t like to be the sucker. And European countries are helped far more than we are, and those countries should pay more to help Ukraine.”
Trump asked Congress for “deep cuts to foreign aid” in his March 15, 2017 budget message. “It is time to prioritize the security and well-being of Americans, and to ask the rest of the world to step up and pay its fair share.”
• Delays in foreign aid are nothing new. “This hold on security assistance [to Ukraine] was not significant,” Ambassador Kurt Volker told the Intelligence Committee. “I had seen holdups of assistance. I just assumed it was part of the decision-making process.”
President Trump withheld $300 million in aid to Pakistan last year, for neglecting its anti-terrorism commitments. Obama chopped aid to Uganda in 2014 after it adopted cruel anti-gay statutes. Human-rights worries prompted President Jimmy Carter to chop aid to Argentina, Ethiopia and Uruguay.
• Despite all the controversy, Ukraine received its lethal military aid on Sept. 11. If those funds were unallocated on Oct. 1, that would have been illegal. “Not spending money that has been appropriated would violate the 1974 Budget and Impoundment Control Act,” said the Manhattan Institute’s Brian Riedl. However, these funds beat the Sept. 30 fiscal year-end deadline by 19 days—like paying one’s taxes on March 27, rather than April 15.
Rather than a crime spree, Democrats want to impeach President Trump—for honoring one law, legal opinion, or precedent after another!
Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor, a contributing editor with National Review Online, and a senior fellow with the London Center for Policy Research. Bucknell University’s Michael Malarkey contributed research to this opinion piece.