Illegal Alien Criminals AGAIN Protected by Sanctuary NY City

Double-convict who sold drugs at schools among the offenders rounded up by ICE…

Report: Immigration & Customs Enforcement Only Catches 0.4% Who Overstay Visas

PHOTO: ICE

(Brendan Clarey, Liberty Headlines) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement recently arrested four men in two days after they were released from New York Police Department custody, despite detainers on them from the agency.

The NYPD released the prisoners from four separate locations within the last week notifying federal authorities, despite the agency’s regulations, according to a release from the agency.

The agency’s Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers removed the men under Field Director for ERO New York Thomas Decker, who said the arrests protect the people who live in the city.

“The release of criminal aliens back on New York City streets continues to pose a dangerous risk to our communities,” Decker said. “ICE remains committed to arresting and removing criminal aliens in the interest of public safety and national security, despite the city’s decision to not honor detainers and jeopardize the safety of its citizens.”

ERO deportation officers on Tuesday arrested a 45-year-old Dominican man who was ordered to leave the country in 2003.

Since then he was twice convicted – in 2007 and 2009 – for selling drugs on school grounds.

He was previously arrested by the NYPD in June who released him without notifying ICE. He is in ICE custody and is “pending removal to the Dominican Republic.”

ICE also arrested a 22-year-old from Spain, who was taken into NYPD custody in March of 2013.

The same day he was taken in, ICE filed an immigration detainer with the NYPD’s Queens Central Booking.

He was released without notifying ICE. He was caught Tuesday and is now in ICE custody.

**MORE COVERAGE OF SANCTUARY CITIES at LibertyHeadlines.com**

On Monday, ERO officers arrested a 38-year-old Mexican citizen who was similarly released by the NYPD while having an ICE immigration detainer placed on him.

He is currently in ICE custody.

Monday also saw the arrest of a 20-year-old from China by ERO agents in Staten Island.

The man was arrested in July by the NYPD, and an immigration detainer was filed the same day.

The man was “later released from New York City custody without the detainer being honored and without notification to ICE,” the press release reads. He is in ICE custody.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 Liberty Headlines

  • R G

    Glad I moved outta NY 2yrs ago. Even Long Island is “infested” to the point of collapse. When the Fed $$$ starts to dry up these leeches will burn it down. Sad .

    • Front Sight

      Of course. Then they will complain because their town has been burned out and there are no neighborhood stores to service them. They will “SCREECH” because nobody will want to invest in a business that will get “burned out.” Maybe they will eat their own!

    • slk5

      i left in ’85, even then parts of the island was already trashed!!!

    • Born Again Southern Pride

      “Even Long Island…” Seriously? Been that way for a very long time…

      • R G

        Granted it is. I moved out of NYC to patchogue/medford area in 74 while it was still somewhat slightly infested. Things got stupid after Bill Clitoon signed NAFTA. Got very stupid at 9/11/01 and worse when Omofo started and the economy tanked for good.

  • disqus_rEWjgfyzIp

    Leave it to the New Yorker’s not to mind their kids on drugs as they havent forced the state government to remove the illegals selling their kids drugs. Just make sure to keep your illegal pets there as the rest of us dont want them.

  • Codygunn

    Trump will have to do the Governor’s job. The Gov needs jail.

    • AKLady

      Apparently, your school failed to teach you about “separation of powers”.
      Apparently, they also failed to teach you about jurisdiction.

      • slk5

        aww cupcake, apparently you still have your head up your…

        • JB

          What? Who are you talking to? I don’t see any cupcake on the board!

        • AKLady

          The constitution applies to people, not citizens: United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 494 U.S. 259 (1990) and District of Columbia v. Heller 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008).

          In the 2014 case Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County, federal magistrate judge Janice M. Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that immigration detainers violate detainees’ Fourth Amendment rights and are merely requests that are not legally binding.

          • slk5

            aww cupcake, the useful idiot now telling me how to act…spin all you want, illegal, is illegal, is illegal…

          • AKLady

            Only in your mind … The U.S. Supreme Court said thw Constitution applies . That is why unless a person is caught in the ACT of crossing thw border, they must be provided a hearing.

          • slk5

            only in your safe space mind…you come here illegally, you’re an illegal, simple as that…and it doesn’t matter how a liberal socialist judge picks and chooses, the supreme court always overturns you…FAKE NEWS!!!

          • AKLady

            Save the immature insults, the “safe space” insult is worn out, juvenile and meaningless. Same goes for the “fake News” garbage. Oh, and the Cold War ended decades ago.

      • Patrick Murphy

        The federal detainer trump’s city or state laws snowflake. Any idiot that can read knows that from law books.

        • AKLady

          However, the Constitution is above your interpretation of law. The constatation apples to people, not citizens: United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 494 U.S. 259 (1990) and District of Columbia v. Heller 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008).

          In the 2014 case Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County, federal magistrate judge Janice M. Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that immigration detainers violate detainees’ Fourth Amendment rights and are merely requests that are not legally binding.

          • Patrick Murphy

            Your 2014 case is under appeal and waiting for the supreme court to take it up.As for the rest the bill of rights says the laws of the land were meant for our citizens and not to be inferred on non citizens. This was done to keep the people loyal to this country alone. Just because your left wing judges make a ruling does not make it legal and there for the challenge to see if can and will hold up which in this case it won’t as there is case law to shoot it down on appeal.

          • AKLady

            Sorry, Patrick we only have one Constitution. It is the law of the land. It applies to everyone in the U.S. and its territories. The only exception to citizen birthright are the children of diplomats.

            You might want to look at U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and Fong Yue Ting v. U.S (1893).
            The Supreme Court has repeatedly made it very clear, the U.S. Constitution applies to everyone within the U.S. Borders. That is why only illegals caught in the ACT of crossing the border can be immediately put out of the country.

      • sally

        AKLady,
        I guess your school forgot to teach you about the “Rule of Law” and that the Federal government main job is the safety of the country. You socialists are liars and attempt to deceive the people. I guess you did not learn that the government is responsible to we the people, and that the government is not their to take away our freedom. Read the Declaration of Independence. I guess they also forgot to teach you that our government is a social compact between CITIZENS and the government not illegals!!!
        It is our right (citizens) to abolish our government and institute a new government when our unalienable rights are violated.
        And yes by designed these so call schools are just places of progressive propaganda camps. In reading your replies I see they did a good job on you.
        Yes we all know that they have been changing and/or attempting to change our Constitution for decades telling us it is a living document!!! That in itself is a joke. Another lie by your friends.
        I really don’t know why you are on this site with your deception, your side doesn’t want you or what?

        • AKLady

          Equality under the law is part of that “Rule of Law” you whine about, but have never actually studied.

          The Constitution is a living document. It has already been mended 27 times.
          .
          I suggest you take an American Government class at your local community college.

    • David Carpenter

      Don’t forget the mayor!

  • Jerry Hughes

    We are going to have to pass federal laws that make it a federal crime to aid and abet the criminal aliens, it should carry a mandatory 4 year minimum sentence without the possibility of patrol.
    Let’s see if the liberal dem bloodsuckers want the illegal votes badly enough to go to jail for them and then lose their right to vote as convicted felons.

    • sum1

      Took the words out of my mouth.

    • chocopot

      Start with the Governor, Mayor, and City Council.

      • Criers

        How about arresting them all for aiding and abetting.

        • AKLady

          How about they are sued for huge amounts of money for violating their jurisdiction?

      • AKLady

        Start with the elementary schools.
        People need to know the reason there is jurisdictional divisions.

        • chocopot

          No argument with you, but Leftist control of the education establishment is a whole other discussion for another time.

    • Raymond Miller

      I thought it was already a crime to aid and abet a criminal or withhold information about a crime in progress or known.

      • AKLady

        States only have authority to enforce sate law.
        They cannot enforce federal law.
        They have no jurisdictional authority to hold people on federal warrants. If the fed wanted the prisoners, it had the time and people to arrange picking them up.

        • Raymond Miller

          But I am under the impression that they are required to report any illegals that they arrest and/or turn them over to the feds.

          • AKLady

            However, they have no authority to hold them on a federal charge. To do so would exceed their jurisdiction. It would also exceed the individual’s Constitutional rights.

          • cheetah

            Illegals have no rights at all. The way it should be. The way it is in all civilized countries. Rights belong to born citizens, naturalized, and those with green cards.

          • AKLady

            Everyone within the U.S. borders are covered by the Constitution. Only the active duty military is exempted.
            However, they have similar protections under the UCMJ.

            The 5th and 14th Amendments are the reason illegals must be provided hearings before they can be deported. Only those caught in the act of entering the country can be returned without a hearing.

            I suggest you take American Government and/or Civics at your community college.

          • Raymond Miller

            If you are right then we need to change that part of the law. They have no Constitutional rights because they aren’t citizens, and if some a** hole has added that, it is Un-Constitutional, and shouldn’t pass SCTUS review.

          • AKLady

            The Founding Fathers made it very clear that the Constitution pertains to “people” not citizens. Suggest you refer to United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez 494 U.S. 259 (1990) and District of Columbia v. Heller 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008).

        • dolphine2u

          The police department has the right to hold anyone for seventy two hours before having to let them go. Unless they have a lawyer to get them out. In that time a call to ICE could be made. But why would the people that could do anything about it do anything if they are not held accountable? Why would a thief stop what he’s doing if he isn’t held accountable? You do have a good point but it is too simplistic also you judge what the feds can do or not do, how many men they have. You seem to be implying that they are not doing their job even though they can. Did you read the same thing as I did.

          • AKLady

            That is not the issue presented here. The issue is prisoners being released after they have served their sentence.

          • dolphine2u

            You are right. But this is even worse because all they had to do was make a call. It seems like the city Mayor and Governor need to be given penalties not that will help. Cops half to do what their bosses tell them.

          • AKLady

            Make a call? What in the world are you talking about? The fed knew the date and time the release would tale place. All they had to do was be there.

          • dolphine2u

            I do believe that there was 5 illegals that were let go without letting them know. You have to go further than the first paragraph.

          • AKLady

            In the 2014 case Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County, federal magistrate judge Janice M. Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that immigration detainers violate detainees’ Fourth Amendment rights and are merely requests that are not legally binding.

          • Born Again Southern Pride

            Read it again…

          • AKLady

            They were released when their sentence was up.
            State and local enforcement do not have jurisdiction in federal crime.

          • AKLady

            Read Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County (2014), federal magistrate judge Janice M. Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that immigration detainers violate detainees’ Fourth Amendment rights and are merely requests that are not legally binding.

          • Born Again Southern Pride

            I think it actually comes down to notification. The police do not want or are not allowed to notify the feds prior to a prisoners release. If they give them 48 hours notice prior to release and they don’t get them, then I would say bad on the Feds… but if they don’t get notified, bad on the local guys.

          • AKLady

            In the 2014 case Miranda-Olivares v. Clackamas County, federal magistrate judge Janice M. Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon ruled that immigration detainers violate detainees’ Fourth Amendment rights and are merely requests that are not legally binding.

    • Born Again Southern Pride

      We need more laws to get them to enforce the laws already on the books? How about an executive order or two to have them clarify what parts of the laws already on the books that should be enforced over other parts of the laws already on the books that should be over looked to ensure that those other parts of the law are enforced? Yeah, it sounds stupid because it is stupid.
      Bottom line is no matter if we like it or not, states rights are supposed to trump federal laws. That is what this country was founded on.

      “The law must be seen as something that helps the people. It must be seen as something the people want. It must be seen as something that appeared organically. It must seem as though it is the result of the system working, as it is presented, and not the result of how the system actually functions. All of this is essential to maintain control of the people. Without this the people would become restless and a great deal of VISIBLE force would have to be used to maintain control. The grand illusion of freedom would be lost.” source: the truth about the law

      • AKLady

        States can enforce state law. They have no authority to hold anyone on a federal matter. If the crime was serious enough, Uncle Sam could arrange to be there to pick them up.

    • AKLady

      Jurisdiction is not a crime.
      Jurisdiction protects you.
      We do not pick and choose how laws are applied.

      • Wayne Olmsted

        ANOTHER @s$ has come to BRAY at us!!! Possibly a bigger @s$ (figuratively AND literally) than ray2hill. AKfloozy is without a doubt, a FLAMING Commie Liberal!

        • AKLady

          “Insults are the arguments employed by those who are in the wrong,” Jean-Jacques Rousseau.

    • cheetah

      That law is already there. Always has been. Today it’s termed national security.

      • AKLady

        Cite the law, paragraph and chapter…
        The state has n legal authority to hold anyone past the term of their sentence. If the federal crime was important enough, they could have a federal marshal at the door.

  • GeorgeHarris7

    Gee, I wonder whether the state of New York would give me just a slap on the wrist for selling drugs on school grounds.

    • Diane Karmis

      Nah, you or I would be in jail so fast it’d make our heads spin.

      • GeorgeHarris7

        You got that right!!!

        • Diane Karmis

          The thought process behind this kind of crap boggles your mind. It just boggles your mind.

  • RealAmerican407

    Welcome to Obama’s new America…

    Where the concerns and voices of illegals are placed on a pedestal over American citizens!

  • SA Ander

    I guess nypd ISN’T the best police department in the us after all. Just a bunch on the take to look the other way and not getting anything under the table for it.

  • Jim

    New York’s worthless governor and mayor will be crying again the next time there is an attack on there city.

    • chocopot

      No they won’t. They will get up in front of the cameras, like they do after every incident, and tell you how their first concern is the safety and security of the residents, this while they maintain NYC as a sanctuary city that has an estimated two million illegals roaming free and causing havoc, and no one of authority (like the Governor and Mayor) does anything about it.

  • Raymond Miller

    Why do people who live in cities like to be robbed, raped and murdered ? Is it the water that makes them vote Demon-Craps into office ? So they can be set upon by vandals or worse ? Then these geniuses want to take every form of protection away the citizens could use to protect themselves with.

  • Dan Baker

    the person or agency that releases these criminals should be held liable for any crime that is committed by them . the realers shoul also be arrested and fined the max allowed by law

  • Sean Rickmin

    This B.S.all started with nobamba.Most,if not all of the people that are in charge of these sanctuary cities are densoc RATS and don’t care how bad these bottom feeders are as long as they vote for the densoc RATTY party.

  • Clete Tacker

    I have a great idea. Since the insane socialist/communist liberal “sanctuary states” love dangerous CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS so much, we should deport all dangerous CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS to the liberal “sanctuary states”, It would be cheaper than getting them out of the country and they could prey on the socialist/communist liberals that don’t seem to be bothered by all the violent crime committed by ILLEGAL ALIENS. It is a pathetic time we are living in when legal American citizens are socialist/ communist and are advocating destroying the constitution in favor of CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    • Criers

      I like this idea.

    • Mountain_Dew_518

      The only thing with that is they will not stay in those cities or states. They will be traveling all over the US committing crimes and then run back to a sanctuary city/state.

    • Wayne Olmsted

      I agree… But, we also need to build WALLS around these cities to make sure that, once the Illegals enter the sanctuary city, that THEY CAN’T LEAVE!

  • Criers

    Check when you take a vacation to make sure you do not go to a sanctuary city. If you don’t check, don’t cry when an illegal criminal attacks you.

  • Haven’t any funds been cut off from piece off from slacker piece of s*** police departments like new yorks that release wanted illegals back into the street to commit further crimes? With all the farcical nypd police shows that portray these bums as big crime busters, wouldn’t you think they might go along with federal laws? Not even close.

  • ray2hill

    Welcome to all of those who come from anywhere to better their lives and the conditions for their families USA stands with open arms for all those escaping oppression and lawlessness or the promise of unending poverty here you will find shelter and understanding, Welcome as soon as we get rid of the Trump problem..

    • It’s obvious from your screen pic that your a liberal DB. You care to support the illegal scum that oozes into the US? Post your name and address moron and they’ll be sent to your hovel.

      • Diane Karmis

        ray2hill, why don’t you invite them ti stay with you? Flyby is right. See how you’d survive through or be treated for your sympathetic gesture. Put your money where your mouth is. Thank God for the Trump problem as you call it; it’s people like you that helped get POTUS into office with your anti American crap

        • Wayne Olmsted

          Better yet, why doesn’t HE go to THEIR country and live with THEM???

          • Diane Karmis

            That sure would clear up a lot of crap, wouldn’t it? You’re right; if he’s such a bleeding heart and identifies with these people he needs to pack his bags! The welcome with open arms statement can’t apply anymore because who knows what’s coming in here.

    • Wayne Olmsted

      LOOK OUT!!!! The @s$ has returned to BRAY at us again!

  • MIKE6080

    they made sure that they read the bombing terrorist his rights – what rights , going to cost us millions for his medical bills and trial . a 9 would have solved the problem , by the way how was he paying for his apt. up there , he wasnt working and was able to fly to bangledesh. probably getting welfare like the other terrorists

    • Janet

      You nailed it!

  • Dale Rust

    I suggest that it be required of the members of the NYPD have their wives or family members drive them to the city limigts after release. …

  • The duck

    NYC officials are breaking the law. the FBI should be arresting them and the DOJ aught to be filing charges in federal court against them. Any jury would convict unless it was hand picked by Obama and company.

  • Murphmeister

    The question is whether these and other acts of defiance of U.S. immigration law are acts of rebellion against the United States.

  • AKLady

    Jurisdiction is a very important safeguard for the American people.
    Our laws apply to everyone within our borders.
    We don’t pick and choose how those laws will be applied.

  • cheetah

    Easy to handle – convince Trump to freeze all federal money to these cities. They’ll change overnight. Money more important than them. He has the right to do so because it’s for national security, and that’s his job.

    • AKLady

      The Supreme Court would throw such a decision out
      in the blink of nan eye.

      • cheetah

        President overrules supreme court when comes to national security. Check it out.

        • AKLady

          I suppose that is why Trump had to change his travel ban to people from specific countries rather than “Muslims”. Not when flagrant Constitutional violations are the issue.

          • ImOffendedTreatMeSpecial

            It always was people from selected countries and the Supreme Court upheld the ban.

          • AKLady

            Quote: “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

  • John

    Maybe it’s time for ESCAPE FROM NEW YORK type thing and build a wall to keep the vermin in.

    • cheetah

      Amen : )

  • Roy Veteto

    may karma happen here soon . i hope that a government official experiences being a victim of a crime committed by an illegal alien

  • cheetah

    Courts & elected officials refuse to accept fact that sanctuary cities are illegal & breaking federal law. President has legal authority to deport, hold back federal $

  • Henry Gregg Nash

    I fell sorry for the innocent People who have to live near the places where those leeches stay!

  • ImOffendedTreatMeSpecial

    I just don’t understand why the DOJ is not acting on this. These council members who voted for these sanctuary ordinances, the mayors who signed them into law, and the police administrators who are following them are clearly guilty of conspiracy to violate immigration law and harboring illegals. They need to be arrested and tried without delay.

  • Louie Rey

    And that’s just another reason why my wife and I will soon be calling New York our FORMER home. I truly feel sorry for the people that have to put up with the insane politicians that infest this state’s government. However, they actually deserve all of the ramifications because they continuously vote Democratic. In fact, registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans in New York by over a six to one margin. Just goes to show you that they’re not as sophisticated as they make themselves out to be.

  • Kirk Kahler

    ok boys and girls what we are seeing is the simple fact that the democrats care more for the illegal votes then they do for us the American citizens ! Sanctuary city’s are illegal and we the people do not want them but the left is fighting every day to protect illegals and turn the American people in to cash cows to give there loved illegals every thing for free when we have millions of Americans in need ! this is sick and un-American and I feel that any federal funding they get should be pulled ! any one in office that is not working with the laws of the land strait to jail ! any one who lets an illegal loose after ice called for them to be held and they hurt some one or kill some one then that person should go to jail for murder and that department or city should have to pay the family’s ! I for one am sick of the democrats lies, cheating me, using my taxes money for illegals over Americans, using me as a cash cow , putting me in danger , having double standards , not following the law, supporting terror/hate groups ANTIFA BLM and worst openly supporting there violence ! this crap needs to end I do not want to be ruled by them ! I do not want my rights taken a way by them ! o do not want to pay for there miss deeds and there illegals with my taxes ! as Americans we all should be out raged at what they are doing and call for them to stop and in many cases step down !

  • Rita Rivera

    Government funding for sanctuary cities like mob filled Chicago and New York should be cut off. The mayors of both states are Democrats who promise their citizens everything they want and when they win t their elections forget about them. Their system is crooked. These so called political rulers are corrupt and do not care about their citizens. They only care about being elected and ruining the country by letting convicts and illegals run around and kill innocent people. They only care about themselves. That is not including the Chicago murders that happen every day. I am glad that I live in Texas because our state would not tolerate this kind of injustice to our citizens.

  • JB

    Every official in the state from the governor, the mayor of New York City and all the elected officials i.e. police Commissioner police chief etc. should have criminal charges placed against him removed from political office and find millions of dollars! These are the people that are ruining this country and making it easier for illegals to get away with all kinds crap!

  • Sylvia Avila

    Where is the AG? time to arrest or charge these Sanctuary Cities!

  • therealworld

    Wall off New York City.

  • Maggietish

    Clearly the Democrats and liberals/progressives are victimizing the American people. No matter what crimes “illegals” commit against the American people whether it be attacking them, raping American women and killing them the Democrats support the “illegals” at the expense of the American people and their lives. Wake up America!

  • Laurence Almand

    Any person who is robbed or raped by a criminal illegal should have the right to sue the Sanctuary City (or state) for encouraging criminals to invade the area. This “sanctuary” nonsense merely encourages criminals, who know they can get away with their illegal activities. Suppose a city announced it was a “sanctuary” for serial killers? Same thing.